1999 Eagle Vision vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1999 Eagle Vision is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Eagle Vision weights approximately 460 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1983 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1983 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Eagle Vision | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Eagle | Ford |
Model | Vision | Tempo |
Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |