1999 Eagle Vision vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1999 Eagle Vision is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Eagle Vision weights approximately 470 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1992 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Eagle Vision | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Eagle | Toyota |
Model | Vision | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1999 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |