1999 Eagle Vision vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1999 Eagle Vision. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1999 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Eagle Vision weights approximately 155 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2008 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2008 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Eagle Vision | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Eagle | Rover |
Model | Vision | 75 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |