1999 Fiat Bravo vs. 1963 NSU 1000 LS
To start off, 1999 Fiat Bravo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Fiat Bravo | 1963 NSU 1000 LS | |
| Make | Fiat | NSU |
| Model | Bravo | 1000 LS |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 42 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
