1999 Fiat Bravo vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1999 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 1999 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Fiat Bravo | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Bravo | Calais |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 344 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |