1999 Fiat Duna vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1999 Fiat Duna is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1999 Fiat Duna. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1999 Fiat Duna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 480 kg more than 1999 Fiat Duna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Duna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Fiat Duna | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Duna | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3030 mm |