1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford 021 C (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 128 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | 021 C | 2000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |