1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 283 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford 021 C | 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | 021 C | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 29 L |
