1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1974 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 38 kg more than 1974 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1974 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Ford 021 C has automatic transmission and 1974 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1974 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Ford 021 C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford 021 C | 1974 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 021 C | 240 C |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
