1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 856 kg more than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Because 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 021 C | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 99.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 107 L |