1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Ford 021 C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford 021 C (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford 021 C (146 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1999 Ford 021 C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | 021 C | 66 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |