1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford 021 C (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 348 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford 021 C (146 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 1999 Ford 021 C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | 021 C | Lynx |
Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 121 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2400 mm |