1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 128 kg more than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (162 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 1983 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 021 C | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2560 mm |