1999 Ford 021 C vs. 2009 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford 021 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 2009 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford 021 C | 2009 Lincoln MKS | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | 021 C | MKS |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 72 L |
