1999 Ford 021 C vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. Both 1999 Ford 021 C and 2009 Mazda 3 are equipped with a 1,596 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 213 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford 021 C (146 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 1999 Ford 021 C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 021 C | 3 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |