1999 Ford 021 C vs. 2009 Volvo S60
To start off, 2009 Volvo S60 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S60 (258 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford 021 C | 2009 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | 021 C | S60 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 258 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |
