1999 Ford 021 C vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C. 1999 Ford 021 C has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Ford 021 C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford 021 C | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 021 C | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |
