1999 Ford 021 C vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 153 kg more than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Ford 021 C has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Ford 021 C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | 021 C | C30 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |