1999 Ford 021 C vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Ford 021 C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford 021 C (100 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford 021 C (146 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1999 Ford 021 C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra. 1999 Ford 021 C has automatic transmission and 2011 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2011 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Ford 021 C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford 021 C | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 021 C | Micra |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 46 L |