1999 Ford Contour vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1999 Ford Contour is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Contour (200 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Contour weights approximately 587 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Contour | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Contour | 92 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1951 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |