1999 Ford Cougar vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental

To start off, 1999 Ford Cougar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1999 Ford Cougar. (168 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 996 kg more than 1999 Ford Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Cougar 1965 Lincoln Continental
Make Ford Lincoln
Model Cougar Continental
Year Released 1999 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2544 cc 7048 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 284 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1410 kg 2406 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 5500 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 2000 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 3210 mm