1999 Ford Cougar vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 1999 Ford Cougar is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Cougar weights approximately 48 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Cougar 1966 Mercury Cougar
Make Ford Mercury
Model Cougar Cougar
Year Released 1999 1966
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2544 cc 4728 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1410 kg 1362 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2830 mm