1999 Ford Cougar vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1999 Ford Cougar is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1999 Ford Cougar. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Cougar.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Cougar. (176 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Cougar | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Cougar | 280 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
