1999 Ford Cougar vs. 1982 Seat 127
To start off, 1999 Ford Cougar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Cougar (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Cougar weights approximately 625 kg more than 1982 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat 127. (64 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Cougar | 1982 Seat 127 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Cougar | 127 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2230 mm |