1999 Ford Cougar vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Cougar. (176 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Cougar. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Cougar has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Cougar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Cougar | 2006 Nissan M | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Cougar | M |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 462 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
