1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1235 kg more than 1958 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Econoline | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2540 mm |
