1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Econoline | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7275 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2980 mm |