1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1895 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Econoline | Seven |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2240 mm |