1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 442 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Econoline | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 575 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2210 mm |
