1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2.5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1282 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Econoline | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6801 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 569 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2415 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
