1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1973 Mazda 616
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1535 kg more than 1973 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 451 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1973 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Econoline | 616 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 575 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |
