1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1982 Renault 11

To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 11 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1982 Renault 11. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1550 kg more than 1982 Renault 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 11. (136 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 11.

Compare all specifications: