1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lotus Etna. (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Econoline | Etna |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 575 Nm | 408 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |
