1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Econoline | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6801 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2415 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2470 mm |
