1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1986 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 1986 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Econoline | Swift |
Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1360 mm |