1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1992 Lexus LS
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lexus LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lexus LS would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Lexus LS (242 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (212 HP @ 4450 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 540 kg more than 1992 Lexus LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (393 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Lexus LS. (350 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Lexus LS.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 1992 Lexus LS | |
Make | Ford | Lexus |
Model | Econoline | LS |
Year Released | 1999 | 1992 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 4450 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2820 mm |