1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 850. (125 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 850. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | 850 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7275 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 575 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2670 mm |