1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1005 kg more than 2000 Plymouth Prowler.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Econoline | Prowler |
Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
Body Type | Van | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 610 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2880 mm |