1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (188 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | Megane |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 188 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2690 mm |