1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2003 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2003 Subaru Forester is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Forester. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2003 Subaru Forester. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Forester. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2003 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Econoline | Forester |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |