1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2003 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1580 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Slavuta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2003 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Econoline | Slavuta |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2330 mm |