1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln LS. (232 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 698 kg more than 2004 Lincoln LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln LS. (298 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Econoline | LS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 474 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2910 mm |