1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 909 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Econoline | Tribute |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6801 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 266 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2415 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2630 mm |