1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Opel Omega

To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2004 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 652 kg more than 2004 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Omega. (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Econoline 2004 Opel Omega
Make Ford Opel
Model Econoline Omega
Year Released 1999 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5407 cc 2198 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 252 HP 142 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 474 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2385 kg 1733 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 2060 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2840 mm