1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 521 kg more than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Econoline | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2774 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 1864 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2660 mm |