1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 812 kg more than 2005 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | Econoline | Sable |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |
