1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 Pontiac G6
To start off, 2005 Pontiac G6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac G6 (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac G6 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 771 kg more than 2005 Pontiac G6.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac G6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Pontiac G6. (285 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Pontiac G6.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2005 Pontiac G6 | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Econoline | G6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2860 mm |