1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 495 kg more than 2005 SsangYong Rexton.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Rexton. (307 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Ford | SsangYong |
| Model | Econoline | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7275 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 575 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 1950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
