1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2007 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2007 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2007 Honda CR-V. (166 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2007 Honda CR-V.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 2007 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Econoline | CR-V |
Year Released | 1999 | 2007 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2353 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2630 mm |