1999 Ford Econoline vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (264 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 338 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Econoline | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 264 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2880 mm |
